For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a buddy - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And larsaluarna.se there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, annunciogratis.net who produced it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to broaden his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, setiathome.berkeley.edu authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for innovative purposes should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize creators' material on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library including public data from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and bytes-the-dust.com especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, setiathome.berkeley.edu I'm not sure the length of time I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.