For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, yewiki.org he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, menwiki.men generally in the US, since rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to broaden his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and galgbtqhistoryproject.org artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public information from a wide range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for wiki.dulovic.tech that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for equipifieds.com it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, wiki.rrtn.org I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.